A blog isn’t the place to go into problems of this scope, but for some reason today I find myself annoyed again by the almost universal practice of hinting—not saying things directly but instead suggesting them, communicating through “masks,” using allegorical techniques to “send a message,” to “veil” what the speaker wants to say about a topic, a person, a work of art or a body of work. The most idiotic and cowardly form of this is the timed phone call, where the caller hangs up. There have been a lot of those lately. (I know, I know, I could get caller ID, but why should I have to?) Anyone intrigued by this subject might check out an essay I published in the online magazine Drunken Boat. Here’s the link:
http://www.drunkenboat.com/db8/
An earlier post took up the question of courage; and clearly the source of so much indirection is cowardice, the fear of standing out from the herd, of having negative things said about you, of not getting good treatment from the various dispensers of literary fame. But where’s the surprise in that, considering the quality of American life today? Practically no one nowadays ever risks doing or saying anything that might incur censure or even loss of a free lunch. We have a wimpy Congress that has taken the war in Iraq lying down, we have a public that quickly falls into step if anyone calls their objections to what is happening at the national and international level “un-American.” (Why should any citizen of a country that invented freedom of speech, and especially a presidential candidate, have to apologize for observing that our history is intimately entwined with racism--see the Constitution--and that the effects of that history are still with us?) We have religious denominations that actively foster hypocrisy about sexuality and a press that falls into line where the missionary position on so-called “family values” are concerned. The reality is a bit more complex, as New York Governor David Patterson’s recent disclosures demonstrate. I want America back. The nation of freedom fighters—Washington, John Paul Jones, Frederick Douglass, Sojourner Truth, Whitman, Emma Goldman, Langston Hughes, Muriel Rukeyser—has been replaced by a swarm of company men and hinters. They have their reward, in the form of consumer goods and medals. But the palm goes to figures like Noam Chomsky, Adrienne Rich, Toni Morrison, Marilyn Hacker, and Gore Vidal.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
1 comment:
hi,
i think that this is a very importnat post and i hope that it engenders the sort of discussion that yours usually do , and i hope that people like mark jarman and r.s. gwynn take the time to refelct and post their opinions how this issue relates to younger poets and in particular poets who are marginalized for whatever reason...they need to talk about things other than their own little squabbles which fascinate me but our elders, or at least my elders need to ask how the current political situation, the economy and this insistence on good manners hinders the lives and careers of young marginalized poets who face hardship due to their identity or aesthetic practices....
and again iw ould claim that this insistence on good manners minding your manners is a result of scarcity of goods, has a ted kooser or carl dennis ever said anything that is an emotinal/intellectual/aesthetic risk....
with so many poets, so few publishing venues, you have no choice if youre young to watch what you say, someone might hold it against you, and that could stop your book for being published for years...
being young and insiginifcant, ive been sending out my second book and ive been a finalist a few times now, and am shocked at the number of entries(500-800) and being a finalist means in the top 30, and i do know im at my best almost mediocre (i have to strive to be average), and am always surprised by my friends who are invariably more talented than me (i only befriend people more intelligent than me which is a fairly easy fear) who have less than i do....
i don't have enough to say to write a blog, but i think of young bloggers like eduardo corral or charles jensen whose poems ive looked up because i like what they have to say who have not yet profuced full-length books and it's not because obviosuly a lack of talent but a market that is so oversaturated and people get lost no matter how persistent and there you are...
and then i think how much pressure must be on these young gay male poets to talk about what they love poetry and the communuity to not offend anyone because they have a career to still secure and a book to get...this isn't to mention all the other interesting and vital young poets out there who are marginalized for cultural/aeshteitc leanings...
i just mention them because they write about things that i like because i can mistake them/take them as my own direct interest,because i am a self-abosrbed man....
it's scary out there, and even here in your comment box, afrad that you're bugged by me because all i want is attention and love like any other person who writes or opens their mouth...
i hope other older poets follow your lead and ask questions and ask people for their honest opinion, a lot of older people like to soliloquize and wax nostalgia...im still hurt that r.s. gwynn never wrote me back...what a meannnie!
reginald writes people back and when i harrassed rigoberto gonzalez and william logan and major jackson on the poetry foundation of ameica website they wrote back...
though it is my dream to have my own blog on the poetry foundation of ameican websire and hope that osmeone in charge sees this post and asks me to do a gig...if they do, id punctuate and spellcheck, i teach compostion and know how to do those things,
steve fellner
Post a Comment